Recently, I've been reading a science fiction novel by Stephenie Meyer called "The Host". In this novel aliens have invaded our world and taken over our bodies to the point that humans are almost extinct. However these aliens continue to follow the human routine, with only a few exceptions. In the extraterrestrial's version of Earth there is no crime, disease, war, or poverty. They have essentially created an utopia by excluding humanity from the equation. Their resoning is that the human race is vile and do not deserve the beautiful planet that they were awarded. The aliens define being human as being violent, deceitful, hateful, and irresponsible with their resources. After a course of events one of these aliens finds herself living in a community of humans in hiding who resisted the invasion. The alien begins to challenge her preconceived notions of what it means to be human and so do the humans who are coexisting the community. After a murder attempt inside their community the characters begin to define humanity differently. One of them describes being human as having compassion and love for others.
I now question my own definition of humanity. Should the definition of humanity be limited to biological factors, or does it go deeper than that? After all, does not our definition of something humane indicate that the being in question is marked by compassion? If I choose to define human as having a moral conscience and displaying affection to other creatures I have excluded figures such as Hitler form the human race.
The truth is that everyone will define human differently. After pondering this for a while I realize that I would rather define humans as beings of compassion, growth, and imperfection. It may challenge the scientific definition but that's ok with me. The truth is that to me those three things define humanity. Even the most hard hearted have the potential for compassion. Don't even the murderers love? We all grow and change it's something we cannot control. Whether it be physical, mental, or emotional, we are always experiencing some kind of growth. Last but not least, not one of us is perfect. We have all made mistakes. I realize my definition leaves something to be desired but that is the beauty of knowledge as many have stated in class, it is different for everyone. The knowledge I believe to be true may be different then yours.
The Value of Human Life?
Doesn’t it seem like the value of human life has been diminishing since the very beginning? That’s how I view it at least. Let us start from the creation of human existence; the indigenous people believed that animals were equal to humans, that they were just four-legged homosapiens. Well, that is just a great belief, so what exactly does make us any different than animals?
Fast forward just a few years later. Let us travel deep into the jungles of Mesoamerica where most of the cultures, like the Mayans and Aztecs, believed that sacrifice was deeply symbolic. See, they thought that human blood and life was the most important thing, but they were so careless with it, tossing it aside without a second thought just to please their gods. This whole outlook starts the belief of “what will one less person matter?” after all; death creates life, and once the sacrifice returns back to the gods, they are now able to create more life. Part of what led to the destruction of these Mesoamerican Empires was the conquistadors, who tried to convert these so called “savages.” What really defines someone as being civilized? Our cultures have completely brainwashed us into believing that those who act slightly different than what we are used to, automatically makes them less civilized, and that it is our job as the intelligent and caring people that we are, to make them civilized.
What has time done to us? Do we not realize that the value of human life has been lowered so far deep below the surface that we are willing to kill our own children? This is a tricky topic to talk about just because it is so controversial, but I believe abortion is murder. How can a mother who is carrying her own baby decide that she doesn't want it anymore and will murder it before they even have a chance to decide for themselves?
-Alexa Newsome (more will come!)
What is Life?
What is life? Can such a question be answered in an hour? If it could then College would take a lot less than four years. The Websters of the world give roughly thirteen definitions for the word Life ranging from the text book to the existential to the adjectival, but even more interesting to me than the question of what is life is the question of why we care about such things as "What is Life?" Beyond the pale of our literal needs for a definition, such as standardization for the purposes of law and medicine lies my fascination that we are fascinated, specifically I am not fascinated with the question its self, but by the fact that we can, want to, and are able to think about such a question. Human beings posses a singular trait that has propelled us as a species to a somewhat ironically unconceivable level of understanding which has let us unlock and prod at the secrets of our universe, this power of abstract thought is so amazing that we are able to wonder why we wonder and it is all of that, that singular human condition that we take for granted that motivates me to learn, to spend eight years of my life learning why we can learn and believing that no matter what we learn or realize or create that the fact we can learn, realize, and create will always be infinitely more fascinating.
In a sense I was asking the same question ludmilla was, the question of what is human is such an odd one because even though we live the answer every day, we still are not sure what it is, and she shared that setiment with questions on if biology defines a human or if it is more, perhaps it is our emotions, our compassion that makes humans, human. To me what she was saying that it we are not the sum of are parts, but what we are capeable of that defines us as human, and I suppose in a way I agree with that though I believe I would have a much more boring (read: sciency) reason for believing something along those lines. -Alexander Snell
What is considered human? (This is a brief glimpse of my stealthlab, and the interesting comments that followed it)
I took a Pro-life stand point on abortion, much to the horror and anger of my fellow students as well as my teacher. My senior English teacher was the most biased person ever. If you wrote something about how you liked Bush, hated Obama, opposed abortion, opposed gay marriage, or anything else completely left-wing, you better have a good argument because you'll probably get at most a C.
In my opposition, I took a pretty blunt stance on it. The image below pretty much sums up my persuasive essay.

I've always joked with my friends, saying "I'm not Pro-life, I'm anti-whore".
I agree with you on abortion. Where does it end? --Alaura Marriott
Alexander Snell wrote:
Honestly I think your stance on abortion is a tad bit more controversial then your stance on the tobacco industry, I noticed that you seem in general to dislike the idea of abortion becoming a "quick fix" to one night stands and the like but you completely left out the chance of rape. I personally have no problem with abortion mainly because I place no value on a at most 24 week old bundle of flesh with no real nervous system that lacks any thing to call it human besides shape. I also have to ask if no one can tell which parts of the bible to truly believe and its supposed to the the divine manifestation of god, then its either all right, or you are saying that God is wrong, or man was wrong in their interpretation and that would make it impossible to tell which parts to truly believe in because it was all written by man.
From which I replied:
Oh riiiiight, rape yeah forgot to mention that. That was the only argument that my classmates could come up with that didn't involve cussing, screaming, and throwing stuff at me. I'd like to introduce you to THESE FUN FACTS about rape http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html
And your right, the fact that a baby begins to develop a nervous system at week 3, along with a heart that starts beating at around week 10 at least, definetly makes it less than human. And what do you mean 24 weeks? Is that the average life of a fetus for you?
And as for the whole God thing, it all comes down to when you think life begins. The 6th Commandment of the 10 Commandments states "THOU SHALT NOT KILL". If your like me and consider life as beginning at conception, abortion infrindges on it.
I'm hoping we can develop on this into an argument. (And Alex, if it sounds like I'm being harsh or mean to you, its all in good fun and compitition)
We are increasing in number, what about resources?
I decided to write a little bit about social sustainability. This time, I wanted to include some statistics and put it on the table. I invite the readers to evaluate this information and try to come up with possible solutions to this matter.
By definition and according to Wikipedia, sustainability is “the capacity to endure”, and “the ability of an ecosystem to maintain ecological processes, functions, biodiversity and productivity into the future." Since I wanted to focus my analysis on sustainability based on its social dimension, it will be appropriate to define the term “social” as well. We can define social as “a characteristic of living organisms, humans in particular.” Wikipedia also defines the term as "a system of common life". If we combine both terms, “social sustainability” we might end up with the following definition “is the idea that future generations should have the same or greater access to social resources as the current generation.” As I mentioned before, it has been scientifically proved that “humanity is living unsustainably.” This could represent a big problem if human beings are planning to live for the next hundred years. I’d like to provide some statistics showing the human population growth from 10,000 BC – AD 2000. The following information is provided by the 2008 Revision of the official United Nations. I got this from the Wikipedia web site.
“According to the 2008 Revision of the official United Nations population estimates and projections, the world population is projected to reach 7 billion early in 2012, up from the current 6.9 billion (May 2009), to exceed 9 billion people by 2050. Most of the increase will be in developing countries whose population is projected to rise from 5.6 billion in 2009 to 7.9 billion in 2050."
As you can see, we are growing very fast. Currently, the impact of humans on the Earth are tending to cause harm, threatening chemicals that are critical to life, as for example, water, oxygen, carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus. So, you may ask yourself, what are we going to do? Are we going to start to kill people? DEFINITELY, NOT! We don’t need to get too drastic. What do you think? What should we do if we want to prolong our existence?
The Autism Vaccines Debate
The 603 section has started a minor friendly debate. These are the links: Vaccines; Vaccines - the other side. What are your opinons?
What is women abuse? Why does domestic abuse happens? Why do women go back to their abuser?
Stockholm Syndrome is the mystery of loving the abuser.
this is from http://www.mental-health-matters.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=167
In clinical practice, some of the most surprised and shocked individuals are those who have been involved in controlling and abusive relationships. When the relationship ends, they offer comments such as "I know what he's done to me, but I still love him", "I don't know why, but I want him back", or "I know it sounds crazy, but I miss her". Recently I've heard "This doesn't make sense. He's got a new girlfriend and he's abusing her too…but I'm jealous!" Friends and relatives are even more amazed and shocked when they hear these comments or witness their loved one returning to an abusive relationship. While the situation doesn't make sense from a social standpoint, does it make sense from a psychological viewpoint? The answer is - Yes!
this is m response to all of this, Priscilla Camargo
women and children that suffer from domestic abuse. This problem is increasing in intensity as well as numerically in our society. The most important reason why it is still a problem is that many women are too afraid to report their spouse to the police. Most of them don't know the steps to take before and after reporting them.
Unfortunately, many children who grow up around that environment are brought up with the idea that it’s normal to be abused. An organization that teaches the negative effects of abuse from an early age would help generations in the future succeed in their own spousal relationships. I strongly believe that the safest solution to domestic abuse is to target the problem early in childhood. I was surprised to learn that there is a program that makes regular visits to elementary schools and middles school to demonstrate to children how to deal with anger, bullying, and the negative effects of abuse. I realized that maybe our society is just starting to advance in this area.It has been one of my dreams for the past year, to start a program that can teach girls, the importance of having a safe, and healthy relationship with men.
Homeless
Some people shout "Go get a job, like everyone else!" and drive off after throwing trash out of their window at the mass of dirty blankets in the grass. It's easy to say that when you consider that mass of dirty blankets just a mass of dirty blankets. Is it really that easy?
Don't take a shower.
Get dirt on your clothes and face.
Don't shave.
Dig through garbage cans.
Don't wear deodorant.
Don't get a solid night's sleep.
Don't eat properly.
Now, repeat this for about a year, give or take. Go see if you can find a job. I suspect, one will find, it isn't as easy as it seems. It's hard enough for the average person, with at least a high school diploma, to get a job working nine to five for minimum wage.
"Well...why don't they just go to the shelter?!" Shelters could not possibly have enough funds or supplies to provide adequate care for every homeless person in the city. We have all seen the crazy, mumbling people shuffling down the street with their hands in their pants. Perhaps those homeless people stand out the most because they are different, they catch our attention. They might even scare you. I don't suggest going up to every homeless person you see and giving them a hug and a thousand dollars. But I do suggest considering that these people, are indeed people. They were most likely "normal" like you or I. They probably made mistakes to get where they are today. But does that make it okay to simply let a whole group of people suffer? They have no where else to go.
Criminals in prison have access to "three hots and a cot" meaning three meals a day and somewhere to sleep at night. It seems as though people who haven't necessarily done anything terrible enough to land themselves in jail are punished more than a person who lights houses on fire.
Apparently it's wrong to sleep on a bench now. Or take an apple to keep yourself from starving. It's a difficult line to draw. Where does it go? Between what level of suffering do we decide it's wrong to survive?

"How can you worship a homeless man on Sunday and ignore one on Monday?"
-Sign outside St. Edward's Cathedral in Philadelphia
-- *Living in St. Pete, you see homeless people on a day to day basis. I have given food to homeless people a few times when I am in my car and it baffles me when I open my window and give them food and it seems as if they're pissed off because I'm not giving them money instead. I don't know whether or not to feel sorry for them or help them. I have always wanted to go up to a homeless person and ask them why they are homeless. If it was for not caring enough when they were younger I wouldn't feel sorry for them. When I see homeless people who are young and look able enough to have a job and take care of themselves I almost get upset. Do I seem inconsiderate? What about friends or family? I've also seen signs that say "Why lie? I need a beer?" . Like hell I'm going to give someone money so they can go spend it on beer! Sure, some homeless people are normal people who have suffered and have legitimate reasons for why they are homeless. Others, not so legitimate, and fairly pathetic. I do not understand how someone can let themselves get to a point where they give up and live on the streets and become homeless. What has happened to the will of humanity? Why are so many people fending on other people to survive when others have to work hard to be where they are and support themselves.
--Kristin Stigaard*
My Take: Carla Quintana --> What attracted me to this particular discussion on homelessness was the quote "How can you worship a homeless man on Sunday and ignore one on Monday." This could probably be linked with the discussion on relion as well. But what I'm trying to get at is that people sometimes put this bad rep on people who go to church that they have to be such saints and save the world, and I'm not saying that we should try to live a good life, but the truth is that we are humans. We have faults and short comings and that doesn't make us less than anyone else and we should understand that. However I agree with Kristin. I'd rather take a homeless person to eat or give them food, which I have done rather than give them money. While we'd like to believe that homeless people only want food, there is a reason why they are homeless. Many of them want money instead and I've seen them with empty beer bottles, as well, like Kristin stated. It too makes me mad. But there are efforts to help the homeless and it's up to them if they would like to receive the help or not. And good help, not simply giving them money to get off our backs. To legitimately help them in their efforts to get their life back in order if possible. I believe you don't have to stay homeless, you need to be given the opportunity to pick yourself up and start again. Though it may not be easy, but it's for the betterment of your life in the end. Here's just one link I found for Florida http://www.hud.gov/local/index.cfm?state=fl&topic=homeless In addition to this helpful website there are groups and organizations that go out and help and feed the homeless and at times even provide a job fair and housing options for them. I believe it's called HOPE, a nonprofit organization that offers free haircuts, job fairs etc. for the homeless. 

I'm not quite sure where to post this so people will read it, so I guess I'll put it here: for the narrative assignment I'm having a hard time figuring out what to write about, I have a story I could write, about a friend I had who got addicted to drugs & how I tried to help, but it didn't work...so the only problem is what can I write my argument about? Everyone knows that some people get addicted to drugs and there are already drug programs & that kind of thing, so what can I argue? Any ideas will help...just post them under this. Thanks! --Malory Speir--
Malory, you could consider different definitions of "addiction." The rehabilitation clinics you refer to rely on operational definitions of "addiction" everyday. How do these definitions apply to your friend's journey? Does the category "addiction" facilitate understanding or healing in the scenario you want to narrate? Have you considered compare/contrast your friend's scenario with other stories?
Also-I'm glad you posted to this particular thread. How about all this resonance (and dissonance!)? Wow! A lot to work with right here. Perhaps you could peak to this emergent community (which is growing by argument and counterargument, by connections and disconnections) as your audience, and even cite some of this text, as a way to to further refine your scope, and create exigence for a meaningful discussion about addiction. -ShareRiff
The End of the world...